Should someone buy RIM?

My friend and former co-worker David D’Souza has been agitating for some time for Microsoft to buy RIM.  I’m always arguing against the move.  It’s not that RIM doesn’t have some good assets, it’s that cleaning up the financial mess and avoiding the distraction of dealing with the acquisition is more likely to kill Windows Phone than save it.  Microsoft does not have the DNA to do this.  It hasn’t bought and cleaned up any sizeable failing company, and it has almost no experience dealing with a large manufacturing company!Not only that, any such acquisition is going to hurt margins and perhaps do so for many years.  That’s also one of the reasons that Microsoft has, so far, declined to acquire or invest additional funds in Nokia.  In both cases should Microsoft (or anyone else) acquire the company they are going to have to spend incremental $Billions to lay off far more people than the companies themselves will do, shutter more plants, support the phaseout of older and non-strategic products, etc.  Key executives and dozens of other senior employees will need to be moved into the new business, diverting attention from existing efforts.  What all this means is that something that seems to make strategic sense could actually be tactical suicide.  And for a CEO, business suicide.  Once the excitement wears off Microsoft’s stock price would tank and stay in the doldrums as investors realized what a distraction and resource blackhole RIM would be.  And I think every potential acquirer of RIM (or Nokia) sees the same thing.

What Microsoft would be interested from RIM is the backend business and some of the patents.  It could use the backend business to boost adoption of Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8 in secure-communications oriented businesses.  In essence it could buy the customer base without buying the customer base headaches of the Blackberry phones themselves.  But if it did that, then who would take on the phone business?  If Nokia were healthier than it would make perfect sense for them to take it.  Nokia could then produce a line of Windows Phone 8 powered Blackberries.  This dream scenario was rumored to have been explored.  I don’t know if it fell through because RIM wasn’t interested in selling for a reasonable price, or if Nokia’s declining health make it difficult for them to take on without more financial assistance from Microsoft.  Or that when they factored in after-acquisition costs they could never make the deal work.

So what about other players?  Well, they all have the same problem.  There is a piece of the RIM puzzle that they want, but not all of it.  And no one wants to deal with the mess.  Sure RIM itself could clean things up and then pursue a sale, as happened with Motorola.  Google didn’t buy the “old” Motorola with all of its problems, it waited until the cleanup was over then bought the Android Mobile Phone company that was left.   I think something similar is going to happen with RIM.

If we think of RIM as having two primary businesses, a back-end infrastructure business and a device business, they will eventually be forced to split them.  The back-end infrastructure business has a lot of value to multiple players, but the device business?  I’m guessing it would be of most interest to a Chinese player who wants a leg up on penetrating western markets.  U.S., Canadian, and other western nations are unlikely to allow a Chinese company to buy RIM outright because they rely on the secure infrastructure part of the company too heavily.  So one scenario for RIM is to sell the device business to a Huawei  or ZTE and make their play as a mobile communications infrastructure company.  At that point a Microsoft, Apple, Google, or other player might step in and acquire them.

Are there other possibilities?  Well HTC is constantly chomping at the bit to take control of its own destiny and has threatened to build its own OS from time to time.  But despite an acquisition being possible on paper there are problems.  HTC, while public with a large market cap, is actually a family run company that probably doesn’t have the management depth to take on such a large acquisition.  It is also a company that has problems of its own as its market share shrinks in face of an onslaught from Samsung.

Samsung is frequently mentioned as a bidder and I think they keep looking at it.  But Samsung already has so many frying pans on the fire in the OS arena (Android, Windows Phone, Bada) that adding BBX to the mix seems like a big distraction.  And then there is that cleanup effort that no one really wants.  So I think they’d like the patent portfolio and the infrastructure stuff but don’t really care about the device business, putting them in the same camp as Microsoft, Apple, and Google.

Which brings me to the bottom line.  I don’t think anyone should, nor wants to, buy RIM.  People do, and should, want to buy some of their assets.  And so many companies will hover over RIM waiting to see if they can somehow get the pieces they want without all the baggage.  But no one will buy the whole company, unless it is out of a bankruptcy court proceeding.  At least that’s my guess.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Computer and Internet, Microsoft, Mobile and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Should someone buy RIM?

  1. dave says:

    Absolutely agree. MSFT would do best to acquire patents and technology rights, and avoid the distraction.

    I suspect that what happened to Novell is a more likely scenario.

  2. daruz shoboy says:

    Gettin d back-end of RIM would’ve been d icing on d cake making nokia healthier already, I think RIM nids to change its device market trend. Innovation, sumtin ‘unblackberry-like’ dat should save RIM’s soul totally.

  3. guest says:

    What about either Facebook or Amazon?

    • halberenson says:

      Why would they want it? First of all the customer base is almost entirely composed of business users, not a huge target for either company. Not only that, the enterprises who really drive Blackberry adoption would run like hell from something owned by a consumer company like Facebook. Most would be rather skeptical of Amazon as well. So the customer base would evaporate quickly. Second, RIM has never demonstrated the ability to make competitive consumer devices. So they wouldn’t be a way for either Facebook or Amazon to gain a quick entry into the consumer smartphone business. Third, all of the baggage around layoffs, cost cutting, etc. are even more problematic for Amazon and Facebook than they are for a Microsoft, Google, or Apple. The distraction of dealing with the baggage would outweigh any benefits of the acquisition by 10:1.

      The only way it makes sense for Facebook or Amazon to consider acquiring RIM is by taking halucigenic drugs.

  4. Bob - former DECie says:

    With RIM’s announcement last week that its new phone-OS based phones wouldn’t be available until after this holiday season, has RIM pretty much killed itself and now it’s only a matter of waiting for the pieces to be put up for sale?

  5. SalarHafeez says:

    Out of the companies this article has listed, I would say that Microsoft is the most likely firm to acquire RIM. They definitely have the financial backing, and buying out RIM would give them BB patents. Combine BBM facilities with Microsoft’s current hardware partners and you have a company very capable with competing with the big boys (Apple, Android). I came across an infographic on visual.ly (http://visual.ly/who-will-acquire-rim) that had some other potential companies listed (HTC was listed there too) if you guys are interested.

    Salar H.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s